The ‘Goldfish Memory’ Problem: Where Prompt Engineering Dies
You spend an hour crafting the perfect prompt. You iterate through 15 variations, testing tone, structure, and examples. Finally, you get exactly what you need—a prompt that generates CEO-level executive summaries with the right balance of brevity and insight.
You use it. It works perfectly. You close the tab.
Two weeks later, you need that prompt again. You can’t remember the exact wording. You try to recreate it. You spend another hour. You get close, but not quite right. The magic is gone.
For prompt engineers, this isn’t just frustrating—it’s why you keep reinventing the wheel. Your browser extension should build a reusable prompt arsenal, not force you to start from scratch every time.
The ‘Prompt + Output’ Pair: Why Context Matters
Saving prompts in a text file doesn’t work. You need proof that the prompt works—the actual output it generated.
The Wrong Way: Prompt-Only Storage
Title: Executive Summary Generator
Prompt: "Summarize this in executive style..."
Six months later, you find this prompt. Questions arise:
- What model did this work with? (GPT-4? Claude?)
- What was the actual output quality?
- What input did you test it on?
- Why did you rate this as “good”? Without the output, you can’t validate the prompt. You have to test it again to see if it still works.
The Right Way: Prompt + Output + Context
Title: Executive Summary Generator (CEO Tone)
Prompt:
You are a Fortune 500 CEO's chief of staff. Summarize the following report in executive style:
Requirements:
- Maximum 3 bullet points
- Lead with business impact, not technical details
- Use active voice, avoid jargon
- Include one actionable recommendation
Report:
[Input text]
Test Input: [The actual report you used for testing]
Output:
• Revenue opportunity: $2.3M ARR from enterprise segment if we ship SSO by Q2
• Risk: 3 enterprise deals blocked on this feature; competitors already have it
• Recommendation: Prioritize SSO over new analytics features in Q1 roadmap
Metadata:
- Model: GPT-4
- Date: 2026-01-07
- Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Use Case: Board reports, investor updates
- Tags: #Writing #Executive #Business Now when you find this prompt, you have complete context. You know it works, how it works, and when to use it.
Looking for backup strategies? Check our guide on archiving ChatGPT conversations.
Database Structure 101: Your Prompt Lab
A pile of prompts isn’t a library. You need taxonomy, metadata, and searchability.
Database Name: 🧪 Prompt Lab
Core Properties:
Views:
- Gallery View (Default)
- Visual cards showing prompt titles
- Color-coded by rating
- Quick scan of your best prompts
- By Type (Board)
- Group by Prompt Type
- See all coding prompts in one column
- All writing prompts in another
- Top Performers (List)
- Filter: Rating = ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Sort by Date Created descending
- Your proven winners
- Needs Optimization (List)
- Filter: Rating ≤ ⭐⭐⭐
- Prompts that need iteration
- Improvement backlog
The Iteration Loop: Version Control for Prompts
Great prompts aren’t written—they’re evolved. Your Notion library should track this evolution.
Iteration Workflow
Version 1: Initial Attempt
Title: Code Explainer v1
Prompt:
Explain this code:
[code block]
Output: Generic explanation, too technical, assumes expert knowledge
Rating: ⭐⭐
Problems:
- Doesn’t specify audience level
- No structure to explanation
- Missing practical examples Version 2: Structured Improvement
Title: Code Explainer v2
Prompt:
Explain this code to a junior developer:
Structure:
1. What it does (one sentence)
2. How it works (step-by-step)
3. Why it's written this way
4. Common gotchas
Code:
[code block]
Output: Better structure, but still too verbose
Rating: ⭐⭐⭐
Problems:
- Too long for quick reference
- Missing concrete examples Version 3: Optimized
Title: Code Explainer v3
Prompt:
Explain this code to a junior developer in under 100 words:
Format:
**Purpose:** [One sentence]
**How:** [2-3 key steps]
**Example:** [Concrete use case]
**Watch out:** [One common mistake]
Code:
[code block]
Output: Concise, structured, practical
Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Improvements:
-
Word limit forces clarity
-
Example makes it concrete
-
“Watch out” prevents common errors Notion Structure:
-
v1 → v2 → v3 linked via “Parent Prompt” relation
-
Can see evolution of thinking
-
Can revert to v2 if v3 doesn’t work for certain cases
Prompt Engineering Patterns: Building Your Arsenal
Certain prompt patterns work consistently. Save them as templates.
Pattern 1: Few-Shot Learning
Title: Few-Shot Classification Template
Prompt:
Classify the following text into categories: [Category A, Category B, Category C]
Examples:
Input: [Example 1]
Output: Category A
Input: [Example 2]
Output: Category B
Input: [Example 3]
Output: Category C
Now classify:
Input: [Your text]
Output:
Use Case: Text classification, sentiment analysis, intent detection
Tags: #Few-Shot #Classification #Template
Pattern 2: Chain-of-Thought
Title: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Template
Prompt:
Solve this problem step-by-step. Show your reasoning at each step.
Problem: [Your problem]
Step 1: [First step]
Reasoning: [Why this step]
Step 2: [Second step]
Reasoning: [Why this step]
...
Final Answer: [Conclusion]
Use Case: Complex reasoning, math problems, logical deduction
Tags: #Chain-of-Thought #Reasoning #Template
Pattern 3: Role-Based Prompting
Title: Expert Role Template
Prompt:
You are a [specific expert role] with [X years] experience in [domain].
Your task: [Specific task]
Context: [Relevant background]
Requirements:
- [Requirement 1]
- [Requirement 2]
- [Requirement 3]
Output format: [Desired format]
Use Case: Domain-specific expertise, professional tone, specialized knowledge
Tags: #Role-Based #Expert #Template
Saving Prompts: The Automated Workflow
Manual prompt saving is tedious. Automate it.
The Manual Way (Don’t Do This)
- Copy prompt from ChatGPT
- Open Notion
- Create new page
- Paste prompt
- Go back to ChatGPT
- Copy output
- Go back to Notion
- Paste output
- Add metadata manually
- Tag and categorize Time: 5 minutes per prompt
Result: You stop saving prompts because it’s too much work
The Automated Way
- Have conversation with ChatGPT
- Click extension icon
- Entire conversation (prompt + output) saves to Notion
- Add metadata in Notion (30 seconds) Time: 30 seconds per prompt
Result: You save every good prompt because it’s effortless
Tagging Strategy: Making Prompts Findable
A 500-prompt library is useless if you can’t find what you need.
Recommended Tag Schema
By Technique:
-
#Few-Shot - Example-based learning
-
#Chain-of-Thought - Step-by-step reasoning
-
#Role-Based - Expert persona prompts
-
#Zero-Shot - No examples needed
-
#Iterative - Multi-turn refinement By Domain:
-
#Coding - Programming tasks
-
#Writing - Content creation
-
#Analysis - Data interpretation
-
#Creative - Brainstorming, ideation
-
#Research - Information gathering By Output Format:
-
#JSON - Structured data output
-
#Markdown - Formatted text
-
#Code - Programming language output
-
#Table - Tabular data
-
#List - Bullet points By Complexity:
-
#Simple - Single-turn, straightforward
-
#Complex - Multi-step, nuanced
-
#Advanced - Requires fine-tuning
Filtering Examples
Need a coding prompt:
-
Filter: Prompt Type = Coding, Rating = ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
-
Result: All top-rated coding prompts Looking for few-shot examples:
-
Filter: Tags = #Few-Shot
-
Result: All prompts using few-shot learning Finding prompts for a specific model:
-
Filter: Model Used = GPT-4
-
Result: All GPT-4-optimized prompts
Real-World Use Cases
Use Case 1: Content Creation Agency
Scenario: Agency creates content for 20 clients, each with unique brand voice
Prompt Library:
- 20 “Brand Voice” prompts (one per client)
- Each prompt includes: tone guidelines, example content, forbidden words
- Writers select client prompt from library
- Consistent brand voice across all content Result: Onboarding new writers takes 10 minutes instead of 2 weeks
Use Case 2: Code Review Automation
Scenario: Engineering team needs consistent code review standards
Prompt Library:
- “Security Review” prompt (checks for vulnerabilities)
- “Performance Review” prompt (identifies bottlenecks)
- “Style Review” prompt (enforces coding standards)
- “Documentation Review” prompt (checks comment quality) Result: Every PR gets consistent, thorough review
Use Case 3: Research Synthesis
Scenario: Researcher reads 50 papers per month, needs consistent summaries
Prompt Library:
- “Paper Summary” prompt (methodology, findings, limitations)
- “Citation Generator” prompt (APA, MLA, Chicago formats)
- “Literature Gap Finder” prompt (identifies research opportunities) Result: Systematic literature review instead of ad-hoc notes
Prompt Optimization: The Scientific Method
Treat prompt engineering like experimentation. Hypothesis → Test → Measure → Iterate.
The Optimization Framework
- Baseline (v1)
- Create initial prompt
- Test on 3-5 examples
- Record output quality
- Rating: ⭐⭐⭐
- Hypothesis (v2)
- Identify specific problem (e.g., “too verbose”)
- Propose fix (e.g., “add word limit”)
- Test on same examples
- Compare outputs
- Measurement
- Did output improve?
- Is it more consistent?
- Does it work on edge cases?
- Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Iteration (v3)
- Refine based on results
- Test on new examples
- Validate improvement
- Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Documentation
- Save all versions in Notion
- Link v1 → v2 → v3
- Document what changed and why
- Future reference for similar prompts
Collaboration: Sharing Prompt Libraries
Teams need shared prompt repositories. Notion makes this trivial.
Team Prompt Library Setup
Permissions:
- Prompt Engineers: Full edit access
- Team Members: Comment access
- Stakeholders: View-only access Workflow:
- Engineer creates new prompt
- Tests and rates it
- Adds to “Needs Review” status
- Team reviews and comments
- Engineer refines based on feedback
- Moves to “Approved” status
- Team can now use it Benefits:
- No duplicate prompt development
- Consistent quality standards
- Knowledge sharing across team
- New members onboard faster
Conclusion: Build Your Prompt Arsenal
Your prompts are intellectual property. Your prompt engineering process is competitive advantage. Your iteration history is institutional knowledge.
Don’t let them evaporate in ChatGPT threads. Don’t recreate prompts you’ve already perfected. Don’t lose the context of what works and why.
Build your prompt library with systematic archiving. Save prompts with outputs. Track iterations with version control. Search and reuse instantly.
Ready to stop losing your best prompts? Install ChatGPT2Notion and save your first prompt to your library in under 60 seconds.
Not focused on prompts but need code organization? See our guide on building a code snippet library.
Keywords: build prompt library in Notion, manage AI prompts, save ChatGPT prompts, prompt engineering workflow, Notion prompt template